← Edexcel IGCSE English Literature Revision

High Grade Analysis of If

Next lesson →High Grade Analysis of Prayer Before Birth

Sign in to keep track of the lessons you have watched.

Sign in

Jump to

In this video, we cover:

  • Victorian Context vs. 21st-Century Readings: Understanding late-Victorian moral ideals of stoicism and masculine authority without imposing modern frameworks.

  • Apostrophe & The Universal "You": How direct address creates universal advice for the reader until the final reveal shifts the tone to an experienced parent advising a son.

  • The "If... Then..." Conditional Structure: Analysing the causational link and the mounting, almost overwhelming buildup of moral conditions required before reaching the final reward.

  • Formal Rigid Structure: Why the consistent ABAB rhyme scheme, regular rhythm, and uniform stanza lengths reflect an unyielding, fixed moral standard.

  • Stanza 1 (Stoicism & Balance): "Keeping your head" when others lose theirs, balancing self-assurance with listening to doubt, and practicing modesty ("don’t look too good, nor talk too wise").

  • Stanza 2 (Intellect vs. Action): Not letting dreams become your "master," treating the personified extremes of "Triumph and Disaster" as two impostors, and stooping to rebuild life with "worn-out tools".

  • Stanza 3 (Risk & Absolute Will): Pitch-and-toss as a metaphor for bold risk-taking, enduring loss without complaining, and the synthetic listing of "heart and nerve and sinew" driven by the personified "Will".

  • Stanza 4 (Social Balance & The Final Crescendo): Walking with kings while keeping the "common touch," filling the "unforgiving minute" with long-term purpose, and the final reward where becoming a "Man" surpasses owning the Earth itself.

Timestamps

  • 0:00 – Victorian Context, Modern Perspectives, & Core Overarching Concepts

  • 1:04 – Apostrophe: The Universal "You" & The Final "My Son" Reveal

  • 2:50 – Defining the Capitalised "Man": Concept vs. Biology

  • 4:05 – The Conditional "If" Structure: Causation & The Mounting Crescendo

  • 5:33 – Form & Metre: The Meaning Behind the Rigid ABAB Rhyme Scheme

  • 6:23 – Stanza 1: "Keep Your Head," Stoicism, & Parallelism with Contrast

  • 9:13 – Patience, Integrity, & Victorian Modesty ("Don't Look Too Good")

  • 10:44 – Stanza 2: Dreams as Masters & The Value of Physical Action

  • 12:10 – Personification: Meeting "Triumph and Disaster" as Two Impostors

  • 13:58 – Truth Twisted by Knaves & Stooping to Rebuild with Worn-Out Tools

  • 17:43 – Stanza 3: Pitch-and-Toss, Risk-Taking, & Never Breathing a Word of Loss

  • 18:48 – "Heart and Nerve and Sinew": Polysyndeton & The Personified "Will"

  • 23:20 – Stanza 4: Crowds, Kings, & Maintaining the "Common Touch"

  • 25:29 – The "Unforgiving Minute" & Long-Term Purpose: 60 Seconds of Distance Run

  • 27:29 – The Climax: Owning the Earth vs. Becoming a "Man"

All of these videos are on my YouTube channel. However, there are a few benefits to watching them here instead:

  1. You can register to keep a track of which videos you’ve watched

  2. You can bookmark lessons for later

  3. There may or may not be no ads, but I can neither confirm nor deny and I definitely didn't tell you if YouTube asked, OK?

There are also study materials on the site that can help with this IGCSE:

  • Fiction Technique Bank: An extensive revision toolkit outlining key linguistic and structural devices, complete with explanations and model examples to show you how to analyse writer's craft rather than just spotting techniques.

  • Unlocking Shakespeare: A complete student guide packed with practical reading strategies, contextual breakdowns, and methods to decode Early Modern English without getting stuck in the language.

  • Still I Rise Teaching PowerPoint: A fully resourced, line-by-line slide deck exploring form, structure, poetic devices, and historical context for focused study or revision.

  • Poetry Technique Bank: A dedicated guide designed specifically to master poetic form, metre, rhyme schemes, and structural choices across both seen anthology and unseen poetry questions.

Lesson Transcript

0:00 – Victorian Context, Modern Perspectives, & Core Overarching Concepts

So let's start by just addressing the elephant in the room. Uh this poem is often heralded as a great sort of inspirational motivational poem, but with a modern 21st century understanding of mental health, gender expectations, etc., it's also been seen today as rather problematic in its messaging. We're going to put all of that to one side because ultimately this is a Victorian era poem and it is therefore reflecting Victorian era morals and values, not 21st century ones. So we're just going to be analyzing the key ideas of this poem without putting our 21st century judgments on them. You can of course hold those privately, but we're not going to do that here.

We're going to start by talking about there's a few sort of big overarching things that keep being done again and again and and again in the poem, and if we start by talking about those we can just keep those in mind as we go through the poem. I don't have to be too repetitive saying them over and over again.

1:04 – Apostrophe: The Universal "You" & The Final "My Son" Reveal

So the first thing I want to talk about is the you of this poem. So this poem uses apostrophe, which means it is speaking to someone in particular. However, we don't know who that is until the very end. At the end of the poem it says, "you'll be a man, my son," so that reveals that our speaker is speaking to their child. That being said, we don't find that out until until literally the last line of the poem. So actually the you is able to maintain a universality to it; it is able to maintain this idea of like it's speaking to anybody for the overwhelming majority of the poem, and that is ultimately what Kipling wants.

At the same time though, if I just jump to that "my son" aspect, it does give the poem a sense of someone with wisdom, knowledge, and experience imparting that to someone who perhaps is more innocent, inexperienced, and so on, which fits with the very strong advisory tone throughout this poem—advisory and celebratory. The reason I say celebratory is this poem is celebrating all that is great about—you know, all that is challenging about being a man and advising on that, but also what what is great about being a man and how wonderful good men can be, what great qualities they can have. Because ultimately that is what this poem is about: it is about the power, the strength, the authority that a man can hold above all the other ridiculousness that can go on in this world.

2:50 – Defining the Capitalised "Man": Concept vs. Biology

It's important to note though, when Kipling says "a man," he does not just mean any biological males man. If we again just look at the last sign of the poem and the fact that that "man" is capitalized, he is referring to the idea of man, the concept of man, as opposed to just any old bloke. So man means so much more than being male; it is—he is talking about everything that sort of man as a gender, masculinity represents, and everything that is great about it.

As I mentioned before, you know, this poem is often celebrated and loved because it feels very inspirational, and that is in large part because of the themes that we're going to see throughout this poem. Obviously there's a clear aspect of identity—you know, what makes a man, that is a key aspect to this poem, like going through all the different traits that they hold. But there's also a theme of perseverance and facing adversity and the strength of character you have to have to be able to do that. And it's that perseverance in the face of adversity and the strength of character that is often why this poem is seen as so motivational, so inspirational.

4:05 – The Conditional "If" Structure: Causation & The Mounting Crescendo

Another thing that happens throughout this poem is the conditional sentences—the "if," if you do this. So it's like the condition is if you can do this, then you can do that. Key thing we want to actually analyze about that is that it creates a causational link: if you can behave in this way, then you get to be a man.

And Kipling keeps us waiting for ages for the "then you'll be a man, my son." So this this massive buildup of if you can be like this, if you can be like this, if you can be like this, if you can be like this, if you could be like this, if you could—and because it takes so long, it creates an almost overwhelming feeling of what it takes to be a man. There is so much that it takes to be a man.

Now I think there's room for interpretation as to whether Kipling wanted that overwhelming if to have negative effect on you or pointing out just that there is too much that it takes to be a man, but I would argue that's more of a 21st century reading of the poem with our sort of critique of gender expectations. I think Kipling really did mean this more as a triumphant overwhelming, more of a great men are this and this and this and this and this and this. So I don't think the overwhelming nature of the if building is meant to be stressful; I think it's more meant to be celebratory of how great men are.

5:33 – Form & Metre: The Meaning Behind the Rigid ABAB Rhyme Scheme

The final repeated technique I just want to raise before we start looking actually line by line is the structure of the poem. Really rigid rhyme, stanza length, and rhythm to this poem. In terms of rhyme, we're dealing with an ABAB—and we'll forgive Rudyard Kipling for rhyming "you" and "you"—but that is the rhyme scheme that we have going all the way through. And the point is less so much the actual rhyme scheme is is less important; the point of the rigid structure going the whole way through I think reflects that sense of how fixed it is of what makes a great man, almost as if like there is no arguing with what qualities it takes to make a man great. Like this is it; this is the sort of gospel list, if you will, of what makes a great man.

6:23 – Stanza 1: "Keep Your Head," Stoicism, & Parallelism with Contrast

"If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you"—so keeping your head is a metaphor for calm control. If we think about the head representing like your mental state, if you can keep it rather than lose it, you are one who is able to remain calm and rational in a, you know, difficult time. That's going to keep coming up again and again, and we have a word for that, and that's stoicism. And being stoic is something that's going to keep coming up as one of the great traits of being a man. So I'll tell you what I'll do: keep a little list over here of all of our different traits.

Another thing is that contrast between keeping your head versus losing theirs. Something else Kipling is going to keep doing is contrasting the great man with everybody else, and that is a key theme—that the great man is able to be what others are not. He is extraordinary, and I don't mean that in the sense of he's some mega genius or something like that; I just mean he is able to to achieve what others cannot, he is able to do what others cannot.

"If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you, but make allowance for their doubting too"—the key thing about this line is the parallelism that also embodies a contrast. Now let me explain what I mean by that. First of all with the parallelism: so it's essentially the grammar is is very similar, so it's like "trust yourself when they doubt you, make allowance for their doubting too." It's very similar grammatical structure to the two lines, and yet they contrast because they're asking you to do opposing things. There is trust yourself in the face of doubt, but also have a little, you know, listen to their doubts at the same time. And this combination of the parallelism and the juxtaposition—I can see I'm going to struggle to find room for all the notes in this poem today—um, what that does is embody another key trait of what it means to be a man, and that is that you are able to be multiple things simultaneously. In this case, what you're able to be multi simultaneously is you're able to be self-assured, that means you have like confidence in yourself, but you are also able to listen to others at the same time. So you are able to seemingly hold within you contrasting qualities, but actually qualities that, when you are able to hold both of them, just make you even greater. Cuz obviously someone who is self-assured and never listens to anybody else becomes arrogant; somebody who only listens to others but never trusts their own voice becomes insecure. So what he's pointing out is the importance of a sort of balance of different traits.

9:13 – Patience, Integrity, & Victorian Modesty ("Don't Look Too Good")

Next one: "If you can wait and not be tired by waiting, or being lied about, don't deal in lies, or being hated, don't give way to hating, and yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise." It's the same techniques as the previous one in terms of the parallelism and the juxtaposition, but in a more concentrated scale, because you've got: "can wait and not be tired by waiting," "being lied about, don't deal in lies," "being hated, don't give way to hating." So you've got that exact same the parallelism and juxtaposition, but while previously it occurred over the two lines, now it's occurring within a single line. So that intensifies that sensation of you needing to behave, in this case, behave differently to the way in which you are treated. And that's arguably part of what I was saying before of how you need to be exceptional, you need to be extraordinary, you're different to others. They can treat you this way, but you're not going to be that same way.

But through all of this, of course, "don't look too good, nor talk too wise." That is, again, um, classic British trait um of not being arrogant, not being egotistical, not thinking too highly of yourself essentially. In other words, if I phrase it as a positive rather than the not be, it's: be modest, be humble. So in fact we can add that to our list.

10:44 – Stanza 2: Dreams as Masters & The Value of Physical Action

So we come back to our more metaphorical lines now: "If you can dream—and not make dreams your master; if you can think—and not make thoughts your aim." First of all in terms of what they symbolize individually, dreaming and think: we can think of dream as symbolizing your aspiration, while think could be seen more as your sort of like intellect. So we've got two parts to it then.

"Not making dreams your master"—this metaphor suggests that you are controlled by this intangible concept of the dream. Don't be controlled by the intangible. And that's essentially "not make thoughts your aim" as well: don't become someone who only thinks and doesn't act. In both cases we've got these abstract nouns, and the key bit is them not being what what sort of controls or drives you, not what like directs you, I guess would be the thing that connects both masters and aims. It's what gives you your sense of direction; do not let the abstract control you. So if we think back to our great men and the traits that they have, the "if you can dream" and "if you can think": they, you know, they aspire, they are intelligent and thoughtful, but at the same time, you know, they're not just some—like no shade, but like academics, philosophers who sit around thinking all day. They act; they get things done.

12:10 – Personification: Meeting "Triumph and Disaster" as Two Impostors

Now we've got some interesting personification in the next line: "If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster." The capitalization indicates—and the fact that you're meeting them um indicates that they're being personified, which just makes them feel more like an adversary, an enemy, a a something you're facing up to as a man. Obviously Triumph represents like success, things going well; Disaster, things going terribly um, and so there's also an antithesis between the two of them as well.

But what's interesting is that Kipling refers to them as "two impostors just the same." Now why does he do that? Why does he refer to both Triumph and Disaster as impostors? I think the point that he's trying to make is this idea of, you know, they both represent the extremes of the scale, and what he's saying is neither of them are represent reality. And that could be reflecting this idea by using the word disaster and triumph: they're very evaluative words, there's a lot of judgment in those words about how something has gone, that doesn't necessarily reflect reality. And so what he's saying is treat those two impostors just the same. This personification is saying don't change your behavior according to how a situation is perceived, and that's reflecting the idea that great men know not to get sort of caught up in an event of itself, but a sort of, again, they're extraordinary, they just remain above it. I think we could argue that that reflects uh a trait of being consistent: no matter what the situation, you behave essentially the same way.

13:58 – Truth Twisted by Knaves & Stooping to Rebuild with Worn-Out Tools

Our next metaphor: "If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools." So the metaphor in this line is the truth being twisted, because you can't actually physically grab truth and twist it. And a knave is an unscrupulous person, an untrustworthy person. The metaphor of being twisted by knaves is manipulated by untrustworthy people to make a trap for fools. So the trap is a metaphor for how um language, uh truth can be used to control others. Of course Kipling is being quite insulting of those others by calling them fools; it suggests they lack intelligence, but that's just again part of um Kipling trying to make it seem like the great man is just above the crowd, he's above it all um and he's really different from everybody else. Note, by the way, I keep saying great man; obviously Kipling himself doesn't say great man, he just says man, but just remember what I was talking about. If he is talking about the man, capital M, as an ideological concept um, which is what I I mean by when I say great man, you know, this is someone more than just someone who is born biologically male; this is more than that when he says man.

"Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken, and stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools"—so this metaphor is quite a nice one to be able to analyze in an essay, because both of these uh examples that we've just talked about, this one and this one, they involve the man not being able to control something. Okay? Cuz if we think about this verb of watch, you have to stand by and see something happen; uh similarly, bear to hear, you're standing by to hear something happen. You lack control. So it's how does the man handle a situation when he is not in control of it? Now with the first one, you just have to essentially tolerate it, okay? You have to tolerate, you have to just bear to hear what they've done to your truth and how they've manipulated it. With this next one, "watch the things you gave your life to, broken," your response should be to stoop and build them up with worn-out tools.

So in other words, if we think about the things you gave your life to, giving your life to something creates an image of massive importance, and when that is juxtaposed with the metaphor of it being broken, essentially it's like something really important to you has been destroyed. However, "stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools"—this is our perseverance, absolutely. Because the stoop means to lower yourself. If you've seen my analysis of My Last Duchess, you know about this word already: stoop is to lower yourself. So that fits with what we were talking about before; one of the characteristics of a man is modesty, humility. They're not afraid of doing what they have to do.

Similarly, "build 'em up"—rebuild things, persevere. "Worn-out tools"—the fact that it's worn out would suggest it's something you've done again and again and again, and therefore again fits with perseverance. You may have done something, but you will do it as many times as is necessary. So these two lines, all about—all a metaphor for the perseverance. I think as well the choice of a sort of tool metaphor fits with the image of a man as handiness, craftsmanship, um hard physical labor. Remember we've already had communicated to us we don't want to be someone who just dreams and thinks; we want to be someone who acts. And I think that's another key aspect to this metaphor: it is physical action, not just thinking about things.

17:43 – Stanza 3: Pitch-and-Toss, Risk-Taking, & Never Breathing a Word of Loss

Our next metaphor I cannot encourage uh our under-18s out there to engage with as a form of gambling um, but it's essentially high risk: "If you can make one heap of all your winnings and risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss." In this metaphor, gambling is being used as a greater symbol for being a risk taker, which of course is another of our traits of a man. Wow, this list is starting to really build up!

But then of course we have what he's done frequently: we then have the antithesis—"and lose, and start again at your beginnings and never breathe a word about your loss." So this "start again" is this part of the metaphor of gambling is again about perseverance, while the "never breathe a word about your loss" is again the stoicism, because it's never complain about what has happened. He's continuing the same kind of pattern. He's like, in the positive behave in this way, and the negative behave in that way. So it's no matter the situation, good or bad, you behave in a way that is, you know, appropriate for a man, that is honorable for a man.

18:48 – "Heart and Nerve and Sinew": Polysyndeton & The Personified "Will"

"If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew"—so what's interesting about this is our uh triadic structure combined with synthetic listing. So triadic structure just means three things; it's a list of three things: heart, nerve, and sinew. But also he's listed them with the ands, cuz you could have done heart comma nerve and sinew, but he's also made sure the ands are in there. So there's a couple of effects to that.

If we think first of all about the items in the list—I always think with listing you want to analyze the words in the list, and then why put them together in an asynthetic list: heart, nerve, sinew. Obviously heart representing emotion; you—if you think about your nerves, it's like your your confidence, your courage; and then sinew I think has been chosen because it's such a tiny part of us. If you've seen my analysis of The Tyger, you'll have seen me analyze this word in that poem as well. It's such a small part of the body, it represents this idea of like every tiny little bit of you you control. Because of course prior to this triadic structure, the key dynamic verb was "you can force." So that word force has within it a connotation of massive power and control over something. And in this case, obviously the triadic structure of heart, nerve, sinew, they are all different parts of the body. So essentially it's about having a high level of control over yourself, but specifically like your courage, your emotions, and the sinew—every little bit of you. I think the synthetic listing is therefore important in creating that mounting sense of having you've got this and this and this building up, creating a sense of physically building up everything you have the force to control.

And the point of what we're trying to force this heart, nerve, and sinew to do is "to serve your turn long after they are gone, and so hold on when there is nothing in you except the Will which says to them: 'Hold on!'" Now this is again our perseverance, right? Because if it's to serve your turn long after they are gone, so it's like you don't even—you have nothing left in you, but you are still going um. And I think it's significant that again he capitalized Will: this concept of like your determination to keep going with something being so powerful, it is personified as its own sort of character within you.

This is actually one of the most popular images in this poem, and I think the reason for that is it's this idea of a great man keeps going even when it seems like, you know, others couldn't keep going. He's got nothing left. It's a like extraordinary level of perseverance. And I've just realized we haven't even got perseveres in our list of traits you have to have yet! Big one: perseveres. And that's an important distinction, isn't it? It's not just that you keep going when times are hard; essentially what Kipling has been going through are the sort of nuances of that perseverance: you keep going multiple times, you don't just persevere once, you persevere again and again and again. That's what the stoop and build them up was all about. Meanwhile, the "lose and start again at your beginnings" is that idea of the consistency in your perseverance: you were a risk taker then, you'll be a risk taker again, and you'll keep taking risks. So it's like don't lose confidence in who you are just because something didn't work the first time; stay true to who you are. I think we should add that to our list as another trait. And then our heart and nerve and sinew is another aspect to this perseverance where it's like you persevere far longer and harder than most would be able to, and you push yourself incredibly hard. So throughout these different stanzas he's essentially looking at the same kind of traits, but the different sort of aspects to that trait, that concept of perseverance, the different ways that uh perseverance should manifest.

23:20 – Stanza 4: Crowds, Kings, & Maintaining the "Common Touch"

Our final stanza now, and we're going to see a lot of the same things we've already seen before: "If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue"—what this one is about is it's juxtaposing our crowds, which represent sort of being like everybody else, and yet "keep your virtue"—that's like your values. What it's juxtaposing is this idea of being like being able to engage with others, and yet not being a sheep, you know? You're not just going with the crowd.

Our next one: "walk with Kings—nor lose the common touch." I think what Kings symbolize, if you think about all those positive traits of monarchy, it's that sort of nobility, that grace, that authority, that power. Because you can walk with them, it suggests you are similar to them, and yet "nor lose the common touch"—that's back to our humility, our modesty at the same time. So you have the power, nobility, authority, grace—whatever positive connotations you want to apply to King, you have them all, but you're also humble and modest and able to be with the everyman as well.

"If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you"—again that antithesis between the good and the bad. In both scenarios, foes and friends, you're able to maintain a certain consistency and they do not impact you.

"If all men count with you, but none too much"—that line is again putting in that juxtaposition, similar to the um "trust yourself, but make allowance for their doubting" as well. It's this idea—so counting, all men count with you essentially means that you value and respect everybody, but none too much, so you don't give one particular person or anybody too much respect like they like you're almost like you're not a sycophant to anybody. So that's just another example of our juxtaposing two contrasting concepts to show that there needs to be a balance between your different traits.

25:29 – The "Unforgiving Minute" & Long-Term Purpose: 60 Seconds of Distance Run

"If you can fill the unforgiving unforgiving minute with sixty seconds' worth of distance run"—so in this metaphor, I think the unforgiving minute represents the ruthlessness, the adversity, the challenge that exists in just all time in existence for human beings. I think the minute is a metaphor for just, yes, time, but more than that, the uh life of a human being. And the reason it's described as unforgiving I think alludes to the regular adversity that human beings face.

And he says if you can fill it with sixty seconds' worth of distance run. So obviously sixty seconds is just another way of phrasing a minute, and I think what the distance run represents—distance, one of the contrasts here is sixty seconds versus distance, right? Sixty seconds, really short period of time; distance run, really long ground to cover. So I think what this metaphor is saying is essentially: first of all, you make the most of all the time that you have, right? Because you're using the full minute for the run. And I think the run is symbolic of how you use your time, and it can be symbolic of like the energy and action that you have all the time in what you're doing. And so you're using all the time that you've have, but also sixty seconds' worth of distance run I think is the point that you you know that every moment adds together to a bigger picture. So these short sixty seconds keep adding together to become a distant run. So another trait essentially: you're a long-term thinker and you know you can make the most of life and how every moment in life adds together to create that overarching picture.

27:29 – The Climax: Owning the Earth vs. Becoming a "Man"

Now we've finally reached the second the—we've finally reached the if this, then this. We've finally got a set of uh two lines that does not begin with if! So here we have our crescendo of if you can do all of those things, here's what you get: "Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it." That metaphor essentially means you will have power, control, authority, everything, right? You are the owner of everything.

And more than that: "you'll be a Man." So I think that that phrase "which is more," it's almost as if being the ideological concept of a man is an even greater power, honor in itself than the level of power, authority, strength suggested by the metaphor of owning everything in the earth. Remember that is a metaphor; it's not literally suggesting you will own the Earth, but it's like you will have a level of power, strength, and authority beyond what any ordinary human could possibly possess.

So that's why I say this poem really is celebrating what it means to be a great man. Keeping in mind of course that to achieve such a title you need to be: stoic, extraordinary, self-assured, listen to others, modest, humble, aspire, intelligent, thoughtful, a man of action, consistent, risk taker, perseverant, staying true to yourself, a long-term thinker, making the most of life. As long as you can just do all of those things, you get to be a man—which uh sounds pretty sweet.

← Do Not Go Gentle